RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin is a widely used anticancer drug for the treatment of many solid cancers. DNA damage is thought to be the key mechanism of cisplatin's anticancer activity. However, cisplatin may also affect cellular metabolism. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of cisplatin on the types of ATP production (OXPHOS versus glycolysis) and their rate in prostate cancer cells and to determine the potentially protective effect of autophagy and amino acids during cisplatin treatment. We also wanted to investigate the potential synergy between the metabolic effects of cisplatin on ATP production and the inhibition of autophagy. METHODS: Cisplatin treatment can significantly affect the metabolism of cancer cells. Important metabolic pathways can be altered, leading to changes in energy production and nutrient utilization. Autophagy and amino acid pool modulations can serve as protective mechanisms significantly affecting tumor cell survival under metabolic stress caused by anticancer treatment. By enabling the recycling of amino acids, autophagy helps cancer cells maintain cellular homeostasis and overcome nutrient limitations. Thus, inhibition of autophagy could have a supportive effect on the metabolic effects of cisplatin. RESULTS: After cisplatin treatment, ATP production by way of OXPHOS was significantly decreased in 22Rv1 and PC-3 cells. On the other hand, ATP production by glycolysis was not significantly affected in 22Rv1 cells. DU145 cells with dysfunctional autophagy were the most sensitive to cisplatin treatment and showed the lowest ATP production. However, short-term autophagy inhibition (24h) by autophinib or SAR405 in 22Rv1 and PC-3 cells did not alter the effect of cisplatin on ATP production. Levels of some amino acids (arginine, methionine) significantly affected the fitness of cancer cells. CONCLUSION: Persistent defects of autophagy can affect the metabolic sensitivity of cancer cells due to interference with arginine metabolism. Amino acids contained in the culture medium had an impact on the overall effect of cisplatin (Fig. 3, Ref. 38).
